The Incredible Hulk CGI Thread (2024)

The Joker_1000 said:

No, I was asking was he serious about us getting a new trailer soon.

Click to expand...

Well it's going to be with Iron Man, which is a month away from now and a month away from Hulk's release, wouldn't call that soon to get the word out. I had hoped the marketing would really get going about now, people kept saying April would be the month everything gets really rolling, now it's going to be May until we get the new trailer and any posters. I'm still under the impression they're sacrificing Hulk's marketing for Iron Man.

These are both shadowed shots of both hulks faces so I thought they'd be good to compare. Looking at them both they seem pretty much even on how good the cgi is, which is a good thing imo since the 03 hulk was one of the most lifelike cgi creatures I've seen.

I'm waiting on a daytime shot of the new Hulk to compare to this one, since this pic is damn good.

wobbly said:

I think the idea was to show equivalent quality pics, seeing as lo-res shots of the new Hulk up close are all we have so far.
Basically, whether there was intentional bias or not, showing both designs on as level a playing field as possible is the best way to compare them (atm).

Click to expand...

Wobbly, I'm sorry. We're going to have to let you go.
Your posts don't target or attack a specific person and they just make way too much sense. They're original, sensible, intelligent, objective, and, quite frankly a pleasure to read. Your use of logic is absolutely perspicacious.

So...

...um...

drop dead.

You have no place here.

dark_b said:

the quality of the screencap from the 08 hulk is bad. use HD shots.

Click to expand...

The quality isn't actually that bad, it't good enough to compare the 2, when we get a HD version with that shot we can compare even better but for now we work with what we've got.

M.E.H.Z.E.B said:

Sarcasm is a forgotten trade.

Click to expand...

How ironic t:

can anybody get that pic of hulks face from the the scene in the house were talbot got trampled over and compair it to the new one of hulks face?

dark_b said:

the guy is pathetic

Click to expand...

You should be the last one calling anyone pathetic. Besides that, all he did was post up two comparison pics of the face and stated which one he thought was better. It wasn't like he went out of his way to make either of the pics look bad. Get off his case and leave him alone, it's not even that serious for you to be throwing insults around like that. Jesus.

Sava said:

lol, its good to see you going out of your way to make this one look great while using s**ty quality pics of the last one :

Click to expand...

I have no steak in this to do that and besides when we get hi-res hots, you will retrack your statements.

Sava said:

lol, its good to see you going out of your way to make this one look great while using s**ty quality pics of the last one :

Click to expand...

Pick any pic you want from 2003 and I'm sure this movie will top it Sava and no one is going out of the way to make any pic look great. It is what it is. The real point is the unfinished CGI looked better in that pic. I chose that because of the similar grimace look face wise.

Nivek said:

Well, we know how much he was bragging that it was the same trailer that was shown at Toy Fair New York, and how we we're all wrong. Oh wait... no one said a damn thing about it. Thats kinda funny...

Enough with the "Finished FX" line people. All your doing is feeding the negativity of people who want to see this fail or at the very least basically repeat what was said about the first film. Your not helping, might as well just make up something about hanging out with Louis L. and Norton in the editing Booth.

Click to expand...

Enough with your whining. You seem to know it all since you play with make-up, I think not. Rather than try and start a false sense of even of having a clue, try having some class and stop trying to cause trouble. You have nothing but bs to type or say. Contribute for once other than critisizing someone. The people in Longwood must be proud to have you.

wobbly said:

I think the idea was to show equivalent quality pics, seeing as lo-res shots of the new Hulk up close are all we have so far.
Basically, whether there was intentional bias or not, showing both designs on as level a playing field as possible is the best way to compare them (atm).

Click to expand...

Yes, both were low-res shots and that was my point. The 2008 looked better in that particular shot.

dark_b said:

the guy is pathetic

Click to expand...

I have read alot of your posts/opinions with others here and while we all agree to disagree at times, not once have I ever said anything to personally attack you. So as I write this, I will leave as you not knowing any better and forgive you for you know not what you do. That is the mature thing to do. Take a page out of that book and we will all get along. Now run along and get back in your sandbox son, you're tracking up the place.t: The pics are for comparison, not to downplay the acheivement of 2003 which was ahead of its time with CGI. They just botched some stuff.

P.S. Show some respect if you want some in return.

Paul-el said:

Is this new pic in a new trailer somewhere?

Click to expand...

It is the last shot of the hulk coming out of the shadows in the trailer that was shown over seas and in theaters with doomsday.

Paul-el said:

nice, is it online yet?

Click to expand...

Yes, here in these very threads you can catch it.

EmeraldBeast said:

Pick any pic you want from 2003 and I'm sure this movie will top it Sava and no one is going out of the way to make any pic look great. It is what it is. The real point is the unfinished CGI looked better in that pic. I chose that because of the similar grimace look face wise.

Click to expand...

really?... lets try.

oh, BTW, here's the same shot you used, yet it doesnt look the same, i wonder why

wobbly said:

I think the idea was to show equivalent quality pics, seeing as lo-res shots of the new Hulk up close are all we have so far.
Basically, whether there was intentional bias or not, showing both designs on as level a playing field as possible is the best way to compare them (atm).

Click to expand...

but it isnt on level playing field though, you've seen the movie, was the dog fight THAT bright?... was he THAT green in that scene. The thing is, the 03 pic is clearly altered. You know that, I know that, EB knows that, thats if he's actually seen the first movie.

EmeraldBeast said:

I have read alot of your posts/opinions with others here and while we all agree to disagree at times, not once have I ever said anything to personally attack you. So as I write this, I will leave as you not knowing any better and forgive you for you know not what you do. That is the mature thing to do. Take a page out of that book and we will all get along. Now run along and get back in your sandbox son, you're tracking up the place.t: The pics are for comparison, not to downplay the acheivement of 2003 which was ahead of its time with CGI. They just botched some stuff.

P.S. Show some respect if you want some in return.

Click to expand...

you were saying for weeks or months that the reason they are waiting with the trailer is because they are finishing the effect.s you said that the effects will be finished. when it came out you were saying day for day that they are UNFINISHED.

where is here the respect?

Sava said:

really?... lets try.

oh, BTW, here's the same shot you used, yet it doesnt look the same, i wonder why

Click to expand...

you knwo what will now happen right? people will start bashing the designe. insted of looking at that pics and talk abou the quality of CGI shaders,compositing,lighting.
no they will start talking how it doesnt look like hulk.

like the designe has anything to do with the CGI quality.

dark_b said:

you knwo what will now happen right? people will start bashing the designe. insted of looking at that pics and talk abou the quality of CGI shaders,compositing,lighting.
no they will start talking how it doesnt look like hulk.

like the designe has anything to do with the CGI quality.

Click to expand...

oh, i know. I hope some here arent THAT stupid ...but...